e621.net · 6151738
Nothing Doing no. 62
[section=Alt]and sure, suicide may not look so great now, but once the technology comes together people will be dying to get in on it[/section]
[section=Notes]Once the next strip comes out I’m going to flip it and this one in the archive for the Optimal Reading Experience. A little trick from the past for future readers to enjoy, and you get to be in on it! This is the power, of website [edit from the future, i decided not to do this. keeping you all on your toes][/section]
[quote]a comic about hating your job and loving your friends[/quote]
https://twitter.com/nothingdotdoing
https://cohost.org/nothingdoingcomic
https://www.tumblr.com/nothingdoingcomic
https://horseonvhs.com/nothingdoing/
https://www.instagram.com/horseonvhs/
https://bsky.app/profile/nothingdoingcomic.bsky.social
Comments
No comments yet.
Log in to comment.
e621.net · 6151738
[quote]"anotherfluffyderg":/users/1551919 said: Even if it weren't used to replace the work of humans, or developed to simplify work procedures, it is still computationally inefficient. There is very little virtue to this technology outside of research applications, and we will eventually find a more efficient replacement for it in this area as well. As it stands, under a capitalist system, it was always going to be developed to create misinformation or reduce the number of people an organisation needed to pay for given work, even if it overall is more costly. But again, even if it weren't, it is inefficient. Purpose developed systems will always exceed it in efficiency, and generally can be refined to be more appealing to the user. [/quote] Someday we'll eventually be competent enough to have to foresight to avoid such generational fumbles, but in the meantime we need to create a super ai and bury it for 200 years and see what happens when it's left alone with its own thoughts for said 200 years.
[quote]"goobie_ii":/users/1518586 said: ... I think it could've really been something that we'd actually appreciate instead of hate. I still have a little bit of hope that in the future we'll finally be able to refine it to be something... [/quote] Even if it weren't used to replace the work of humans, or developed to simplify work procedures, it is still computationally inefficient. There is very little virtue to this technology outside of research applications, and we will eventually find a more efficient replacement for it in this area as well. As it stands, under a capitalist system, it was always going to be developed to create misinformation or reduce the number of people an organisation needed to pay for given work, even if it overall is more costly. But again, even if it weren't, it is inefficient. Purpose developed systems will always exceed it in efficiency, and generally can be refined to be more appealing to the user.
It's such a shame that Ai became the way it did, if it was used and developed in a more productive and helpful way I think it could've really been something that we'd actually appreciate instead of hate. I still have a little bit of hope that in the future we'll finally be able to refine it to be something that isn't another tech company scam thing that actively makes the world worse.
...yep