[quote]"lostdevices":/users/24503 said: Until it's properly regulated on an international scale, it's never justified. generative AI is theft. [/quote] Yeah well pandoras box has already been opened for a couple years And thats what human artists do anyways! Thats why art has gotten so developed up until now, Now the process is so streamlined ypu can eother do hyperspecific prompts and get a passable result or use ot as reference, or a cheap quick and easy meme profile pic for steam, so its opened more possibilities for the less adept to drawing, or who cant/dont want to spend the money on an artist, for an outcome they may not want, over the process of months of waiting. Besides, we all know what "regulation" would end up looking like. Theres no "regulation" for drawing tablets, theres no commercial barring so only the masses can use it Besides THERES AN APPROPRIATE EXAMPLE INFRONF OF US? This is cub is it that nessecary to be concerned??

[quote]"phantomsatyr":/users/2266998 said: not the artists fault ai is easy to ustelize its not even the focus of the piece, it saves time and suits the style its their personal choice and image generation is overly demonized imo, people will develop a better sense of when its justified and when its not eventually [/quote] Until it's properly regulated on an international scale, it's never justified. generative AI is theft.

sad to see an established artist use ai, even if it’s just the background. if you ask me ai shouldn’t be allowed on this platform at all. if this artist is comfortable using ai for their backgrounds, who’s to say they aren’t using ai to generate art in their style and then tracing over it?

[quote]"ff42":/users/609707 said: Who actually cares either way? [/quote] Because AI isn’t allowed on here unless it’s the background.

is it me or does the background look AI generated?

Yeah sure! Why not! Can I do your mom afterwards? xD