[quote] PretendTouching said: What's the point of having filters if people don't tag "male only" properly so I still see males? [/quote] Try looking inward, it's an end-user problem that causes this. Taggers aren't perfect, but there's so many fucking words used to tag for male characters in images on booru sites. You also aren't a paid member and thus are not entitled to anything you cannot provide for yourself in continuing to use the site. Blacklist tags using the built in features found in plaintext within the options for your account. I often ask why people who dislike certain works for whatever reason, will willingly go out of their way to not only view it at much larger scale, but also then take the time to ask why they're seeing it. Blows my mind every time. What's the point in having filters if people aren't going to use them to curate their own blacklists and use more than one blanket term as if you'll never see it again? This site, I may add, has far fewer tagging groups than a lot of other booru-sites, yet there are more than enough to ensure that you will not accidentally catch something you don't want to see by using the time you typed up such tearful comment to look at the tags of whatever the offending picture is to locate more should they be ignorant that more exist. There is no way to fully purge your thumbnail doomscroll happy ending of all potential males, but by caring just the smallest amount, you can minimize it to an incredibly low percentile. Better luck in the future, TLDR Blacklist your own fucking nono zones through the use of some sense, failing that then use the offending material's taglist to find synonymous entries to further lower this issue through the provided blacklisting feature in your account.

What's the point of having filters if people don't tag "male only" properly so I still see males?

Cubs with horsecocks are way too rare