[quote]
cubbysex said:
i want a big bro to use me like that :3 itd be so hot feeling his bigger weewee in my butt >w<
[/quote]
i wanna be your old bro >///<
i want a big bro to use me like that :3 itd be so hot feeling his bigger weewee in my butt >w<
e621.net · 6268514
[quote]"gheezz":/users/1771710 said:
idk man, sometimes I feel like these rules bend so arbitrarily. I got one of my Polly Plantar drawings deleted for being “human only” when the character is pretty obviously a frog and already has many other fanarts (even more human-like) uploaded here.
[/quote]
Might depend on the style of art or staff responsible for the takedown? Their guidance specifically points out things that could easily be mistaken for just a human, and even says certain east-Asian inspired art styles may be verboten. A frog character could lack a lot of animal detail, so if the art style was just "wrong" enough or the piece wasn't in color it might've ran afoul.
[quote]"lycanroke":/users/1977880 said:
I guess some people haven't looked at other humans nor in the mirror in a while
[/quote]
the guy in the mirror is hideous, i can't stand looking at him
[quote]"itazuraayagi":/users/173488 said:
[b]Verbatim[/b], it does [b]not[/b] say human body, animal head counts. It says human head, animal [i]ears/tail/whiskers[/i] counts.
This character "draws the line" - they have a humanoid body, but [b]more[/b] than "a few glued on animal features." By % of animal features that take up their portion of the image, I'd say it's at least 1/3. That's considerable.
[/quote]
idk man, sometimes I feel like these rules bend so arbitrarily. I got one of my Polly Plantar drawings deleted for being “human only” when the character is pretty obviously a frog and already has many other fanarts (even more human-like) uploaded here.
I even tried emailing the staff to see why it was deleted for that reason when the character isn't human, and till this day I haven’t received a response yet.
[quote]"ghtyu":/users/525179 said:
Maybe someone can explain why this doesn't count under the young human/humanoid rules? "The Purge forum post":https://e621.net/forum_topics/45501 says young humanoid is verboten, and "humanoid":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5284 says that animal-head-human-body counts. But now that I look, there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line?
[/quote]
[quote]"Uploaing Guidelines":/help/uploading_guidelines say:
"Human-like" means all humanoid fantasy races, especially ones that have more skin than fur, [b]and[/b] either no or [b]only very minor animal features[/b], like tails, ears, claws, etc.
[/quote]
[quote]"NotMeNotYou":/users/17633 "[u]said[/u]":/forum_topics/45501#forum_post_411121:
h4. What exactly is now forbidden?
Young humans and anything that looks vaguely like a young human in NSFW contexts. This includes plain humans, stylized humans like cartoon characters (The Simpsons, etc), elves, orcs, vampires, zombies, kemonomimi, [b]humans with a few glued on animal features (noses, tails, ears, whiskers, etc.), and similar content.[/b]
[/quote]
[b]Verbatim[/b], it does [b]not[/b] say human body, animal head counts. It says human head, animal [i]ears/tail/whiskers[/i] counts.
This character "draws the line" - they have a humanoid body, but [b]more[/b] than "a few glued on animal features." By % of animal features that take up their portion of the image, I'd say it's at least 1/3. That's considerable.
[quote]"ghtyu":/users/525179 said:
there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line?
[/quote]
because nobody likes the rule and people dont want it to be enforced
someone keeps downvoting lmfaooo
Maybe someone can explain why this doesn't count under the young human/humanoid rules? "The Purge forum post":https://e621.net/forum_topics/45501 says young humanoid is verboten, and "humanoid":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5284 says that animal-head-human-body counts. But now that I look, there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line?
so like, how does octavian work for the rules? his body is human. its only the head thats furry.
gee i didnt realise humans had long snouts and ears sticking up on the top of their head
[quote]"kinkyditto":/users/2453479 said:
Character: literally has the head of an animal
Some Idiot on E621 this morning:
Im gonna report this for being a human like character 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
[/quote]
I guess some people haven't looked at other humans nor in the mirror in a while
Character: literally has the head of an animal
Some Idiot on E621 this morning:
Im gonna report this for being a human like character 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
Comments
No comments yet.
Log in to comment.
booru.allthefallen.moe · 1483882
[quote] cubbysex said: i want a big bro to use me like that :3 itd be so hot feeling his bigger weewee in my butt >w< [/quote] i wanna be your old bro >///<
i want a big bro to use me like that :3 itd be so hot feeling his bigger weewee in my butt >w<
e621.net · 6268514
[quote]"gheezz":/users/1771710 said: idk man, sometimes I feel like these rules bend so arbitrarily. I got one of my Polly Plantar drawings deleted for being “human only” when the character is pretty obviously a frog and already has many other fanarts (even more human-like) uploaded here. [/quote] Might depend on the style of art or staff responsible for the takedown? Their guidance specifically points out things that could easily be mistaken for just a human, and even says certain east-Asian inspired art styles may be verboten. A frog character could lack a lot of animal detail, so if the art style was just "wrong" enough or the piece wasn't in color it might've ran afoul.
[quote]"lycanroke":/users/1977880 said: I guess some people haven't looked at other humans nor in the mirror in a while [/quote] the guy in the mirror is hideous, i can't stand looking at him
[quote]"itazuraayagi":/users/173488 said: [b]Verbatim[/b], it does [b]not[/b] say human body, animal head counts. It says human head, animal [i]ears/tail/whiskers[/i] counts. This character "draws the line" - they have a humanoid body, but [b]more[/b] than "a few glued on animal features." By % of animal features that take up their portion of the image, I'd say it's at least 1/3. That's considerable. [/quote] idk man, sometimes I feel like these rules bend so arbitrarily. I got one of my Polly Plantar drawings deleted for being “human only” when the character is pretty obviously a frog and already has many other fanarts (even more human-like) uploaded here. I even tried emailing the staff to see why it was deleted for that reason when the character isn't human, and till this day I haven’t received a response yet.
[quote]"ghtyu":/users/525179 said: Maybe someone can explain why this doesn't count under the young human/humanoid rules? "The Purge forum post":https://e621.net/forum_topics/45501 says young humanoid is verboten, and "humanoid":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5284 says that animal-head-human-body counts. But now that I look, there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line? [/quote] [quote]"Uploaing Guidelines":/help/uploading_guidelines say: "Human-like" means all humanoid fantasy races, especially ones that have more skin than fur, [b]and[/b] either no or [b]only very minor animal features[/b], like tails, ears, claws, etc. [/quote] [quote]"NotMeNotYou":/users/17633 "[u]said[/u]":/forum_topics/45501#forum_post_411121: h4. What exactly is now forbidden? Young humans and anything that looks vaguely like a young human in NSFW contexts. This includes plain humans, stylized humans like cartoon characters (The Simpsons, etc), elves, orcs, vampires, zombies, kemonomimi, [b]humans with a few glued on animal features (noses, tails, ears, whiskers, etc.), and similar content.[/b] [/quote] [b]Verbatim[/b], it does [b]not[/b] say human body, animal head counts. It says human head, animal [i]ears/tail/whiskers[/i] counts. This character "draws the line" - they have a humanoid body, but [b]more[/b] than "a few glued on animal features." By % of animal features that take up their portion of the image, I'd say it's at least 1/3. That's considerable.
[quote]"ghtyu":/users/525179 said: there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line? [/quote] because nobody likes the rule and people dont want it to be enforced
someone keeps downvoting lmfaooo
Maybe someone can explain why this doesn't count under the young human/humanoid rules? "The Purge forum post":https://e621.net/forum_topics/45501 says young humanoid is verboten, and "humanoid":https://e621.net/wiki_pages/5284 says that animal-head-human-body counts. But now that I look, there are hundreds of posts of this character that are allowed. So where is the line?
so like, how does octavian work for the rules? his body is human. its only the head thats furry.
gee i didnt realise humans had long snouts and ears sticking up on the top of their head
[quote]"kinkyditto":/users/2453479 said: Character: literally has the head of an animal Some Idiot on E621 this morning: Im gonna report this for being a human like character 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 [/quote] I guess some people haven't looked at other humans nor in the mirror in a while
Character: literally has the head of an animal Some Idiot on E621 this morning: Im gonna report this for being a human like character 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭