[quote]"gooey_derg":/users/1227449 said: Say that to the majority of cream the rabbit posts, you can make the same argument for alot of them but they're still tagged young [/quote] Feel free to report any instances where a post is tagged invalidly, and when you try to remove the young tag someone refuses to let it happen and changes it back.

We tag everything here on a post-by-post basis, with what the post appears to be rather than what it's intended to be (Though lore tags can complement tags in times like this.) And in this particular instance, the post looks like nothing other than a fat ass chibi character. For more information review our [[twys]] info.

[quote]"gooey_derg":/users/1227449 said: small body, small proportions, larger head even in comparison to artists other work. idk why im even discussing this with you even more. Just fucking tag it as a child or childlike so other people dont have to look at a clearly child character in the first place... idk why you're so fucking adamant on this but its annoying as hell. you KNOW its a child character and the artist never changed anything except for making their ass larger [/quote] It's a porn site with the most aberrantly tags on the creation but god forbid you put *THAT TAG* on your art because you ruin your entire kinky fetish career, because nowadays furrys are trying hard to get his moral superior and try to get noticed and publicly admire forgetting this shit isn't for anyone, not matter how hard y'all try, I'm gonna keep it for myself not pushing sheet into no one, let the man put the excuses he wants, we already know shhh...

[quote]"gooey_derg":/users/1227449 said: everything about it still screams young to me [/quote] Elaborate on "everything about it" and please provide comparisons.

[quote]"gooey_derg":/users/1227449 said: idk why this is so downvoted, hes clearly meant to be a child, it should be tagged young so people who dont like characters that are meant to be child (or child coded) can avoid it.[/quote] e621 runs on [[TWYS]] which is independent of "vibes" entirely. In fact, one of The Reasons listed on that page is literally for the purpose of blacklists functioning properly. The physical attributes of this artwork does not look child-like to me, even compared to the artist's other (imo silly-looking) art uploaded to this site, so the "young":/wiki_pages/114 tag would not apply, nor would any of the Apparent Age sub-tags be specified arguably -- also the artist didn't intentionally set out to "draw a child" so the "young_(lore)":/wiki_pages/43748 tag wouldn't apply either. Also, he's practically double the size of the anon fucking him...

Yo, who up summoning their patron?