Damn, I am definitely be in aqumarine spectre

[quote]"midiorite":/users/325205 said: Is it "Alpha-Beta" or "Ass Intensity Scale"? [/quote] I suppose in German, ɑβ might be read as "ass" hehe

Is it "Alpha-Beta" or "Ass Intensity Scale"?

[quote]"dba_afish":/users/1382151 said: I think that's backwards. topologically the anus is one of only a handful of orifices that is part of a true/through hole*. most of the [i]other[/i] openings, are pockets (sometimes called "blind holes"). *[sub]assuming some reasonable minimum opening size. since, if your measurements are small enough, the concept of a hole ceases to exist.[/sub] using the scale of the width of a hair as a minimum size, most terrestrial tetrapods would have 7 true holes. [b]in practical tests[/b], however, using the common scale of a banana (or whatever reasonable substitute is readily available) you'd pretty much just have the 1 hole, with the two openings being the mouth and anus. [/quote] Of course. Dude is shoving his reasonable substitute for a banana back and forth in his bros' butt, just to [b]confirm[/b] a topological hypothesis of the number of banana holes in the human body. And maybe one execution isn't enough. It takes a few runs to have satisfactory confidence. [sub]We'll need to test the mouth too.[/sub]

[quote]"sharkinthepark":/users/241455 said: Brilliant indeed! I'd even go so far as to say that butts aren't actually [i]holes[/i], they are just topological folds of tissue inwards. Just as you wouldn't call a person's armpit a hole, the butthole isn't a hole either! Therefore, we should consider renaming it to the more appropriate term, "buttfold". Guys, listen, it's not gay to fuck a [i]fold[/i], right??? Clearly! It's a [i]fold[/i], it's not the [i]same[/i]! [/quote] I think that's backwards. topologically the anus is one of only a handful of orifices that is part of a true/through hole*. most of the [i]other[/i] openings, are pockets (sometimes called "blind holes"). *[sub]assuming some reasonable minimum opening size. since, if your measurements are small enough, the concept of a hole ceases to exist.[/sub] using the scale of the width of a hair as a minimum size, most terrestrial tetrapods would have 7 true holes. [b]in practical tests[/b], however, using the common scale of a banana (or whatever reasonable substitute is readily available) you'd pretty much just have the 1 hole, with the two openings being the mouth and anus.

[quote]"dba_afish":/users/1382151 said: there are experts in the field who have stated that penetration with just the tip shouldn't even be classified as "sex", so you may have to take that into account. in addition to this, the threshold for when the penetration depth is no longer considered "just the tip" seems malleable. [/quote] Brilliant indeed! I'd even go so far as to say that butts aren't actually [i]holes[/i], they are just topological folds of tissue inwards. Just as you wouldn't call a person's armpit a hole, the butthole isn't a hole either! Therefore, we should consider renaming it to the more appropriate term, "buttfold". Guys, listen, it's not gay to fuck a [i]fold[/i], right??? Clearly! It's a [i]fold[/i], it's not the [i]same[/i]!

[quote]"robotdragon5050":/users/2231878 said: Does gayness scale with penetration depth? Surely it’s less gay if it’s just the tip and more gay if you’re full on knotting [/quote] there are experts in the field who have stated that penetration with just the tip shouldn't even be classified as "sex", so you may have to take that into account. in addition to this, the threshold for when the penetration depth is no longer considered "just the tip" seems malleable.

[quote]"robotdragon5050":/users/2231878 said: Does gayness scale with penetration depth? Surely it’s less gay if it’s just the tip and more gay if you’re full on knotting [/quote] Hey RobotDragon, Oh boy, don't get me started on the Δ penetration scale! You'll need an [b][i]anal ruler[/i] [/b]for that one! [i]Dr Knot's eyes glaze while he envisions Greek letters rubbing and pressing each other[/i]

Does gayness scale with penetration depth? Surely it’s less gay if it’s just the tip and more gay if you’re full on knotting