[quote]"cheesetest1000":/users/683049 said:
Maybe the phrasing could have been slightly better, but I hardly see this as a point of confusion if you just take the context and tags into account.
Boy [i](trans guy in front)[/i] won't get to breath until she [i](trans gal in back)[/i] cums.
Girl [i](trans gal in back)[/i] will only cum when he [i](trans guy in front)[/i] passes out.
The obvious implication of [i]he won't breath until she cums and she won't cum until he passes out[/i] is that he is guaranteed to pass out due to gf's choking, at which point, she will cum.
However, I'm well inebriated, and I still figured this out. Therefore, while it could have been an honest mistake or a bad day, it does at least bring into question the reading comprehension of people that didn't get it. Not trying to be offensive, but this is, in fact, a proper use of language, and not "against purpose of language" as some people seem to think.
[/quote]
Even someone with autism and adhd (me) can read it.
[quote]"aliendogfreak":/users/1503706 said:
I thought it was pretty clear that the "she" refers to the girl and the "he" to the boy. You'll have to forgive me for being a bit prickly when someone makes comments questioning the use of pronouns for my trans characters, like 90% of the internet is a toxic cespool and the tone of the original comment was reminiscent of some pretty horrible messages ive had in the past.
I don't think it's "cancelling" to point out to someone they read the post wrong. Like sure, you're probably right that my phrasing could have been better in the original drawing but I hope you can see why "girl > he make it make sense" raised some red flags for me. Like even if these characters used non-traditional pronouns (there are girls who use he irl!! some of my friends do that!) thats still a pretty rude way to ask about it.
ty for the compliment tho!
[/quote]
Maybe for an edit, use colored text? Like "girl" and "she" in red, "boy" and "he" in green or brown? :p
[quote]"helenaku13":/users/198531 said:
where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳
[/quote]
Hai~
Maybe the phrasing could have been slightly better, but I hardly see this as a point of confusion if you just take the context and tags into account.
Boy [i](trans guy in front)[/i] won't get to breath until she [i](trans gal in back)[/i] cums.
Girl [i](trans gal in back)[/i] will only cum when he [i](trans guy in front)[/i] passes out.
The obvious implication of [i]he won't breath until she cums and she won't cum until he passes out[/i] is that he is guaranteed to pass out due to gf's choking, at which point, she will cum.
However, I'm well inebriated, and I still figured this out. Therefore, while it could have been an honest mistake or a bad day, it does at least bring into question the reading comprehension of people that didn't get it. Not trying to be offensive, but this is, in fact, a proper use of language, and not "against purpose of language" as some people seem to think.
[quote]"kingwolf9":/users/288053 said:
Is the text reversed? I'm quite confused.
[/quote]
It's T4T.
[quote]"swiftkill":/users/68125 said:
It causes such reaction becaue is that's against purpose of language. Language is meant to be universal, not personal, outside outside of closed group where they agree to use certain words. That's pretty much the same effect that Carrol parodied in his book with Humpty-Dumpty saying "My words mean what I want them to mean". People like that are generally egocentric (Humpty IS egocentric, believing he's safe from any danger because roayalty would protect him) and it doesn't have anything to do with transgender. There are plenty of "traditional" or even 'conservators" who do that. That's a neat political or debate move to redifine words without "opponent's" knowledge and then go ad hominem at them when they try to point out logic errors (e.g. "Are you stupid? Of course these are nationalists! That's what fascism means, doesn't it?"). Note: my partner is transgender and they say that these have "issues".
Saving grace here is just not very well known fact that "boy" used to be a gender-neutral term, i.e. in victorian time outside of high society time it could be both she or he-kid. But these times long gone, standartisation removed that:
In Middle English, "boy" referred to a young person, regardless of sex, similar to the modern use of "lad" or "youth" (lad, btw, isn't gender-neutral, femenine is lass, both retained in use by scots today).
[/quote]
None of this slop means anything because it has nothing to do with the artist's point lmfao The captions were very clear, and it's the artist's fault that y'all can't read
[quote]"helenaku13":/users/198531 said:
where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳
[/quote]
I found mine at art school hehe
[quote]"lute":/users/35612 said:
Firstly, cute picture!
I'm not sure how it's transphobic to be confused by what appears to be willfully mixed language - if someone describes themselves using a specifically masculine noun like 'boy', regardless of gender assigned at birth or whichever of the various genders or non-genders that person identifies with, it's pretty reasonable to expect pronoun consistency. Similarly for 'girl'.
Except that your response makes it clear it's somehow not what you feel you're doing, this looks bizarrely like misgendering the characters, so there's obviously some context that's missing - could you share it?
I get that people want to do their own thing, but something here feels like drawing a circle on the ground and cancelling everyone who isn't clear what's going on and has the temerity to ask.
[/quote]
I thought it was pretty clear that the "she" refers to the girl and the "he" to the boy. You'll have to forgive me for being a bit prickly when someone makes comments questioning the use of pronouns for my trans characters, like 90% of the internet is a toxic cespool and the tone of the original comment was reminiscent of some pretty horrible messages ive had in the past.
I don't think it's "cancelling" to point out to someone they read the post wrong. Like sure, you're probably right that my phrasing could have been better in the original drawing but I hope you can see why "girl > he make it make sense" raised some red flags for me. Like even if these characters used non-traditional pronouns (there are girls who use he irl!! some of my friends do that!) thats still a pretty rude way to ask about it.
ty for the compliment tho!
where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳
the "he" refers to the boy, the small green deer, the "she" refers to the girl, the red dog. meaning he won't be able to breath until she cums, which will only happen when he passes out. so he's basically bound to pass out. does that clear it everything up?
[quote]"redraven19":/users/342708 said:
girl > he
boy > she
make it make sense
[/quote]
I can't tell if you're trying to be transphobic or if you just can't read
Comments
No comments yet.
Log in to comment.
e621.net · 5715562
[quote]"cheesetest1000":/users/683049 said: Maybe the phrasing could have been slightly better, but I hardly see this as a point of confusion if you just take the context and tags into account. Boy [i](trans guy in front)[/i] won't get to breath until she [i](trans gal in back)[/i] cums. Girl [i](trans gal in back)[/i] will only cum when he [i](trans guy in front)[/i] passes out. The obvious implication of [i]he won't breath until she cums and she won't cum until he passes out[/i] is that he is guaranteed to pass out due to gf's choking, at which point, she will cum. However, I'm well inebriated, and I still figured this out. Therefore, while it could have been an honest mistake or a bad day, it does at least bring into question the reading comprehension of people that didn't get it. Not trying to be offensive, but this is, in fact, a proper use of language, and not "against purpose of language" as some people seem to think. [/quote] Even someone with autism and adhd (me) can read it.
[quote]"aliendogfreak":/users/1503706 said: I thought it was pretty clear that the "she" refers to the girl and the "he" to the boy. You'll have to forgive me for being a bit prickly when someone makes comments questioning the use of pronouns for my trans characters, like 90% of the internet is a toxic cespool and the tone of the original comment was reminiscent of some pretty horrible messages ive had in the past. I don't think it's "cancelling" to point out to someone they read the post wrong. Like sure, you're probably right that my phrasing could have been better in the original drawing but I hope you can see why "girl > he make it make sense" raised some red flags for me. Like even if these characters used non-traditional pronouns (there are girls who use he irl!! some of my friends do that!) thats still a pretty rude way to ask about it. ty for the compliment tho! [/quote] Maybe for an edit, use colored text? Like "girl" and "she" in red, "boy" and "he" in green or brown? :p
[quote]"helenaku13":/users/198531 said: where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳 [/quote] Hai~
Maybe the phrasing could have been slightly better, but I hardly see this as a point of confusion if you just take the context and tags into account. Boy [i](trans guy in front)[/i] won't get to breath until she [i](trans gal in back)[/i] cums. Girl [i](trans gal in back)[/i] will only cum when he [i](trans guy in front)[/i] passes out. The obvious implication of [i]he won't breath until she cums and she won't cum until he passes out[/i] is that he is guaranteed to pass out due to gf's choking, at which point, she will cum. However, I'm well inebriated, and I still figured this out. Therefore, while it could have been an honest mistake or a bad day, it does at least bring into question the reading comprehension of people that didn't get it. Not trying to be offensive, but this is, in fact, a proper use of language, and not "against purpose of language" as some people seem to think.
[quote]"kingwolf9":/users/288053 said: Is the text reversed? I'm quite confused. [/quote] It's T4T.
[quote]"swiftkill":/users/68125 said: It causes such reaction becaue is that's against purpose of language. Language is meant to be universal, not personal, outside outside of closed group where they agree to use certain words. That's pretty much the same effect that Carrol parodied in his book with Humpty-Dumpty saying "My words mean what I want them to mean". People like that are generally egocentric (Humpty IS egocentric, believing he's safe from any danger because roayalty would protect him) and it doesn't have anything to do with transgender. There are plenty of "traditional" or even 'conservators" who do that. That's a neat political or debate move to redifine words without "opponent's" knowledge and then go ad hominem at them when they try to point out logic errors (e.g. "Are you stupid? Of course these are nationalists! That's what fascism means, doesn't it?"). Note: my partner is transgender and they say that these have "issues". Saving grace here is just not very well known fact that "boy" used to be a gender-neutral term, i.e. in victorian time outside of high society time it could be both she or he-kid. But these times long gone, standartisation removed that: In Middle English, "boy" referred to a young person, regardless of sex, similar to the modern use of "lad" or "youth" (lad, btw, isn't gender-neutral, femenine is lass, both retained in use by scots today). [/quote] None of this slop means anything because it has nothing to do with the artist's point lmfao The captions were very clear, and it's the artist's fault that y'all can't read
[quote]"helenaku13":/users/198531 said: where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳 [/quote] I found mine at art school hehe
[quote]"lute":/users/35612 said: Firstly, cute picture! I'm not sure how it's transphobic to be confused by what appears to be willfully mixed language - if someone describes themselves using a specifically masculine noun like 'boy', regardless of gender assigned at birth or whichever of the various genders or non-genders that person identifies with, it's pretty reasonable to expect pronoun consistency. Similarly for 'girl'. Except that your response makes it clear it's somehow not what you feel you're doing, this looks bizarrely like misgendering the characters, so there's obviously some context that's missing - could you share it? I get that people want to do their own thing, but something here feels like drawing a circle on the ground and cancelling everyone who isn't clear what's going on and has the temerity to ask. [/quote] I thought it was pretty clear that the "she" refers to the girl and the "he" to the boy. You'll have to forgive me for being a bit prickly when someone makes comments questioning the use of pronouns for my trans characters, like 90% of the internet is a toxic cespool and the tone of the original comment was reminiscent of some pretty horrible messages ive had in the past. I don't think it's "cancelling" to point out to someone they read the post wrong. Like sure, you're probably right that my phrasing could have been better in the original drawing but I hope you can see why "girl > he make it make sense" raised some red flags for me. Like even if these characters used non-traditional pronouns (there are girls who use he irl!! some of my friends do that!) thats still a pretty rude way to ask about it. ty for the compliment tho!
where can a woman like me get a gf like her? 😳😳
the "he" refers to the boy, the small green deer, the "she" refers to the girl, the red dog. meaning he won't be able to breath until she cums, which will only happen when he passes out. so he's basically bound to pass out. does that clear it everything up?
[quote]"redraven19":/users/342708 said: girl > he boy > she make it make sense [/quote] I can't tell if you're trying to be transphobic or if you just can't read