[quote]"marblesoda":/users/420602 said:
There's nothing wrong or "extremely" weird on shading like that, I didn't notice I missed the other claws when posting it and I didn't care much to fix it because the face was the most detailed part and wasn't as noticeable, I can shade and flat color in whatever order I care to do so, I also made the mistake of painting the correct order of colors of the ribbons, which I didn't care for either, you can see I also left the one on the bottom right uncolored, I didn't notice that either till I posted it, I had other mistakes I fixed after I combined all the layers and painted on top of it because I didn't want to mess with the bloom and multiply layers I had on top and it'd just be quicker to do so that way, also, I've been posting my art for more than 10 years, and I also stream constantly my whole process, so please don't talk about stuff you don't even understand, I have a ton of work I'm doing atm and don't have the time to fix stuff like that on every piece I do, this is my job and i gotta find a balance on the non paid stuff I post like this and commissions, when I work on commissions I'm much more careful not to commit those kind of mistakes and check with my clients if patterns and lines look okay before coloring
[/quote]
I didn't even notice that uncolored ribbon. If you're doing all this real fast, I can understand how mistakes can happen though.
That being said, as someone who's gotten over a hundred commissions, I've never once gotten a wip where some shading (aside from shines a few times) was done with flat color unfinished, or lineart unfinished. I'm aware some artists' process may be odd ones out, but, that would be why I consider it "odd".
[quote]"uninspiredjigglypuff":/users/389588 said:
The wips are extremely weird. One has an arm shaded, the cock flat colored, and the other arm uncolored. That is an extremely odd order to do things in (like, wouldn't you at least want to color both arms first? Why do one *and* the cock and not the other?).
There's also the aforementioned inconsistent claw colors, as well as inconsistent ribbon colors (the one above cock is a totally different pattern), though as far as I know it could be an OC.
[/quote]
There's nothing wrong or "extremely" weird on shading like that, I didn't notice I missed the other claws when posting it and I didn't care much to fix it because the face was the most detailed part and wasn't as noticeable, I can shade and flat color in whatever order I care to do so, I also made the mistake of painting the correct order of colors of the ribbons, which I didn't care for either, you can see I also left the one on the bottom right uncolored, I didn't notice that either till I posted it, I had other mistakes I fixed after I combined all the layers and painted on top of it because I didn't want to mess with the bloom and multiply layers I had on top and it'd just be quicker to do so that way, also, I've been posting my art for more than 10 years, and I also stream constantly my whole process, so please don't talk about stuff you don't even understand, I have a ton of work I'm doing atm and don't have the time to fix stuff like that on every piece I do, this is my job and i gotta find a balance on the non paid stuff I post like this and commissions, when I work on commissions I'm much more careful not to commit those kind of mistakes and check with my clients if patterns and lines look okay before coloring
[quote]"cimsocdups":/users/501797 said:
AI furry porn was trained on MarbleSoda's art since they have such a large collection of publicly released art. So the reality is AI art mimics MarbleSoda's art style, not that Marblesoda's art looks like AI
[/quote]
Oh, i guess this is the reason why i thought that
[quote]"shapie":/users/739774 said:
What The French Toast?
[/quote]
Do you like waffles? Yeah we like waffles!
Do you like pancakes? Yeah we like pancakes!
Do you like french toast? Yeah like french toast!
Do do do do can’t wait to get a mouthful!
yes
[quote]"jmvryt":/users/560267 said:
Those minor types of inconsistencies don't usually mean an AI created this. The fang on the other side is obscured by the penis, and the differing claw designs is because of the different angle they're viewed at.
The fact that the artist posted this and it's the exact same art style should probably point you to think it's not AI generated.
AI is getting better obviously, but there are usually tells hidden in the details. Smudges along hair strands, places where a line doesn't seem to taper off naturally (like it just blurs into nothingness), and other similar problems. Looking for those in this image, there is none. In fact, if you look at the tip of the fur on their ear (top left), there's a brush stroke for the highlight that extends further than it should, which is solely a human error.
Also there's adversarial (or maybe just random white) noise applied to this image, and I don't think AI bros are adding adversarial noise to their own images.
[/quote]
Well said, + on their Twitter they teased the wip with 2 separate photos of their drawing tablet.
[quote]"rreinarim":/users/323387 said:
Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted?
The paws have different claws; Only one left fang;
Or i just night be going crazy...
[/quote]
AI furry porn was trained on MarbleSoda's art since they have such a large collection of publicly released art. So the reality is AI art mimics MarbleSoda's art style, not that Marblesoda's art looks like AI
[quote]"rreinarim":/users/323387 said:
Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted?
The paws have different claws; Only one left fang;
Or i just night be going crazy...
[/quote]
Those minor types of inconsistencies don't usually mean an AI created this. The fang on the other side is obscured by the penis, and the differing claw designs is because of the different angle they're viewed at.
The fact that the artist posted this and their art from before AI image generators has the exact same art style should probably point you to think it's not AI generated.
AI is getting better obviously, but there are usually tells hidden in the details. Smudges along hair strands, places where a line doesn't seem to taper off naturally (like it just blurs into nothingness), and other similar problems. Looking for those in this image, there is none. In fact, if you look at the tip of the fur on their ear (top left), there's a brush stroke for the highlight that extends further than it should, which is solely a human error.
Also there's adversarial (or maybe just random white) noise applied to this image, and I don't think AI bros are adding adversarial noise to their own images.
Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted?
The paws have different claws; Only one left fang;
Or i just night be going crazy...
Who the fuck??
What The French Toast?
Sylveon: Morning! I just moved into the building and wanted to say hi!
[quote]"jean047":/users/1399325 said:
Oh, good morning!
Wait, I live alone.
[/quote]
Not anymore.
Oh, good morning!
Wait, I live alone.
As soon as I saw this, I read the text as "Want to fuck??"
Comments
No comments yet.
Log in to comment.
e621.net · 6169855
I'm lost, in those eyes. God dam...
[quote]"marblesoda":/users/420602 said: There's nothing wrong or "extremely" weird on shading like that, I didn't notice I missed the other claws when posting it and I didn't care much to fix it because the face was the most detailed part and wasn't as noticeable, I can shade and flat color in whatever order I care to do so, I also made the mistake of painting the correct order of colors of the ribbons, which I didn't care for either, you can see I also left the one on the bottom right uncolored, I didn't notice that either till I posted it, I had other mistakes I fixed after I combined all the layers and painted on top of it because I didn't want to mess with the bloom and multiply layers I had on top and it'd just be quicker to do so that way, also, I've been posting my art for more than 10 years, and I also stream constantly my whole process, so please don't talk about stuff you don't even understand, I have a ton of work I'm doing atm and don't have the time to fix stuff like that on every piece I do, this is my job and i gotta find a balance on the non paid stuff I post like this and commissions, when I work on commissions I'm much more careful not to commit those kind of mistakes and check with my clients if patterns and lines look okay before coloring [/quote] I didn't even notice that uncolored ribbon. If you're doing all this real fast, I can understand how mistakes can happen though. That being said, as someone who's gotten over a hundred commissions, I've never once gotten a wip where some shading (aside from shines a few times) was done with flat color unfinished, or lineart unfinished. I'm aware some artists' process may be odd ones out, but, that would be why I consider it "odd".
[quote]"uninspiredjigglypuff":/users/389588 said: The wips are extremely weird. One has an arm shaded, the cock flat colored, and the other arm uncolored. That is an extremely odd order to do things in (like, wouldn't you at least want to color both arms first? Why do one *and* the cock and not the other?). There's also the aforementioned inconsistent claw colors, as well as inconsistent ribbon colors (the one above cock is a totally different pattern), though as far as I know it could be an OC. [/quote] There's nothing wrong or "extremely" weird on shading like that, I didn't notice I missed the other claws when posting it and I didn't care much to fix it because the face was the most detailed part and wasn't as noticeable, I can shade and flat color in whatever order I care to do so, I also made the mistake of painting the correct order of colors of the ribbons, which I didn't care for either, you can see I also left the one on the bottom right uncolored, I didn't notice that either till I posted it, I had other mistakes I fixed after I combined all the layers and painted on top of it because I didn't want to mess with the bloom and multiply layers I had on top and it'd just be quicker to do so that way, also, I've been posting my art for more than 10 years, and I also stream constantly my whole process, so please don't talk about stuff you don't even understand, I have a ton of work I'm doing atm and don't have the time to fix stuff like that on every piece I do, this is my job and i gotta find a balance on the non paid stuff I post like this and commissions, when I work on commissions I'm much more careful not to commit those kind of mistakes and check with my clients if patterns and lines look okay before coloring
[quote]"cimsocdups":/users/501797 said: AI furry porn was trained on MarbleSoda's art since they have such a large collection of publicly released art. So the reality is AI art mimics MarbleSoda's art style, not that Marblesoda's art looks like AI [/quote] Oh, i guess this is the reason why i thought that
[quote]"shapie":/users/739774 said: What The French Toast? [/quote] Do you like waffles? Yeah we like waffles! Do you like pancakes? Yeah we like pancakes! Do you like french toast? Yeah like french toast! Do do do do can’t wait to get a mouthful!
yes
[quote]"jmvryt":/users/560267 said: Those minor types of inconsistencies don't usually mean an AI created this. The fang on the other side is obscured by the penis, and the differing claw designs is because of the different angle they're viewed at. The fact that the artist posted this and it's the exact same art style should probably point you to think it's not AI generated. AI is getting better obviously, but there are usually tells hidden in the details. Smudges along hair strands, places where a line doesn't seem to taper off naturally (like it just blurs into nothingness), and other similar problems. Looking for those in this image, there is none. In fact, if you look at the tip of the fur on their ear (top left), there's a brush stroke for the highlight that extends further than it should, which is solely a human error. Also there's adversarial (or maybe just random white) noise applied to this image, and I don't think AI bros are adding adversarial noise to their own images. [/quote] Well said, + on their Twitter they teased the wip with 2 separate photos of their drawing tablet.
[quote]"rreinarim":/users/323387 said: Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted? The paws have different claws; Only one left fang; Or i just night be going crazy... [/quote] AI furry porn was trained on MarbleSoda's art since they have such a large collection of publicly released art. So the reality is AI art mimics MarbleSoda's art style, not that Marblesoda's art looks like AI
[quote]"rreinarim":/users/323387 said: Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted? The paws have different claws; Only one left fang; Or i just night be going crazy... [/quote] Those minor types of inconsistencies don't usually mean an AI created this. The fang on the other side is obscured by the penis, and the differing claw designs is because of the different angle they're viewed at. The fact that the artist posted this and their art from before AI image generators has the exact same art style should probably point you to think it's not AI generated. AI is getting better obviously, but there are usually tells hidden in the details. Smudges along hair strands, places where a line doesn't seem to taper off naturally (like it just blurs into nothingness), and other similar problems. Looking for those in this image, there is none. In fact, if you look at the tip of the fur on their ear (top left), there's a brush stroke for the highlight that extends further than it should, which is solely a human error. Also there's adversarial (or maybe just random white) noise applied to this image, and I don't think AI bros are adding adversarial noise to their own images.
Is it me, or this looks ai-assisted? The paws have different claws; Only one left fang; Or i just night be going crazy...
Who the fuck??
What The French Toast?
Sylveon: Morning! I just moved into the building and wanted to say hi!
[quote]"jean047":/users/1399325 said: Oh, good morning! Wait, I live alone. [/quote] Not anymore.
Oh, good morning! Wait, I live alone.
As soon as I saw this, I read the text as "Want to fuck??"